Of Grief and Reason
Brodsky begins his essay by discussing the poem Come In. He moves through the poem chronologically, and describes the differences that can be seen by individually analyzing each word. His analysis of the poem serves to highlight the fact that Robert Frost is “as American as apple pie.” His basis for this is the distinction between tragedy and terror, and which category Frost falls under. He believes that Frost’s difference from the “Continental tradition of the poet as a tragic hero” is what makes him “American”. The second poem he analyzes is Home Burial. His analysis of this poem was unlike anything I understood from my own experience with reading and discussing it. He repeatedly calls the wife the “heroine” yet also displays many of her qualities which contrast this claim. A “heroine” is generally a woman in a literary work who exhibits great courage or achievements, but this description does not match Brodsky’s analysis at all. He contrasts the characters by “grief and reason”, the husband being reason and the wife being grief. Her hysterical attitude and inability to understand the way that her husband copes would not make her courageous, but rather weak. He continues by implying that the two are “playing a game”. He describes the stair scene as a representation of hierarchy in the minds of the characters: the woman at the top and the man at the bottom. The woman stays in power for most of the poem, although it is unlikely that she should be. Brodsky reminds readers that the house belongs to the man and his family and has for many years, but as the poem continues, the roles are flipped, and the man towers over the woman from the top of the stairs as she attempts to leave. Brodsky’s claims of fear and embarrassment, both on behalf of the wife, seem slightly far-fetched and a stretched interpretation. He ends by claiming that the physical and emotional separation of the couple allows the ideas of “grief and reason” to be married to each other. Though I’m not sure I follow his interpretation of Home Burial, the concepts of poetry being “utterly American” is intriguing.
I enjoyed this analysis. I believe that overall Brodsky explanation gives the reader insight on what Frost could have meant. Although I do agree that most of his assertions are correct the lack strength. Most of his points are weak. When comparing the two authors I was lost, and could not find the point.
ReplyDeleteI agree that his analysis of "Home Burial" was not accurate. I thought it was scattered and far fetched. Some of his points made sense but over-all I thought his analysis was weak. I did not enjoy that he classified certain poems by their nationality because I feel like that does not play an important role in their work.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what Mary said. His points were not strong and it could get very confusing when he was comparing. Over- all his points were good, they just needed to be more developed and they needed more explanation along with the evidence provided. Brodsky's point does give a reader more insight on the way Robert Frost might have been thinking.
ReplyDeleteI am glad you notice the "chronological" movement of his discussion. I'm really hoping that you all will try this in your own explications. It allows for this "uncovering" and slow discovery of meaning!
ReplyDelete