On Grief and Reason - Jaiden Pugh
Brodsky's argument is that Robert Frost writes very dark literature and that from reading Frost that he himself has become darker in terms of writing style. Brodsky says that from the outside Frost seems like he perceives the world around him positively, but when one dives deeper into his work that his literature is dark. He is also comparing American and British Poets in order for the audience to see the differences in each. He supports this argument by analyzing pieces of Frost’s work from his viewpoint. He breaks them down by stanza then goes and analyzes the lines and finally each word and the connotations. I do not buy his argument because on page 230 he even says that he is analyzing the poem in a slated way in order for it to seem a certain way. In a real analysis, you analyze each word for what it is worth not changing or altering the meaning in order for it to fit your analysis. One thing that strikes me from the article is his effort he put into going word by word and explicitly explaining why each work was placed where it is and why the rhyme scheme is the way it is. Another thing that strikes my interest is his interpretation of the poem, ‘Come In.” I remember my class talking about what the poem meant and stood for and we got on the topic of vampires and how they cannot come in unless invited. I think his analysis of Come in is very clear, cut and to the point, whereas my class we took it far left and was going to an analysis that was more comical. One thing that confuses me is why Brodsky compared two poets. I think we all know that there are differences between American poets and British poets. I did not understand the point he was trying to make. I also do not understand why he chose those specific poems to analyze or what his point was going to prove. This essay adds to our understanding of Frost’s work. After reading this essay we can understand a new viewpoint on Frost. New criticism is heavily employed in the essay within the first couple of pages around the time the author is speaking about Frost and the many accomplishments and his life and effect on literature. Structuralism which analyzes the structure of literature in terms of content is also employed in the middle and towards the end of the essay.
While I was also impressed with Brodsky's ability to pick apart the poems and analyze them, I felt that it was a little far-fetched. I believe that he stretched the poem to fit a certain analysis. Some of the ideas he was creating just did not fit for me. After looking back on page 230, I agree that his analysis is purposefully described to seem a certain way.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more, I too found Brodsky's level of analysis and explication quite impressive, especially on a surface-level view of the text/my first reading with no annotations; however, upon closer examination I found his levels of bias as well as his predetermined thesis was far too boxed and specific. Although there are benefits to specificity, as we have discussed in class about poetry analysis, if an interpretation does not check off all of the boxes, one should not try to impose the aforementioned interpretation because it is simply not correct. While I can take away plenty still from Brodsky's interpretation as is, it might even be more of a benefit to start with a more vague yet correct interpretation of the text (or any text, for that matter), and then hone in on specificity.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that the way he analyzed the poems word by word was extremely interesting. While it may be time consuming I do like the concept. I also agree with the new view point that we have on Frost now. I was interested in his poetry and him and after reading this essay it was intriguing to see a new take on Frost. I had not thought about how Brodsky used structuralism but it makes a lot of sense. I think Brodsky was very creative with his techniques in his analysis and I strongly agree that it gives us a new point of view on Frost and his work, but also on poetry in general and the way we interpret it.
ReplyDeleteJaiden I love your honest and real analysis. I think with certain poem/poets there is never a clear answer and that is where things begin to get frustrating. Expically when trying to talk about it with others. In the end we all make our judgements off of our own personal believes and experiences so it is hard to say what is not correct and what is.
ReplyDelete